UK Aesthetic Clinics Marketing Leaderboard 2026: Thérapie Clinic, Pulse Light Clinic and Laser Clinics UK Lead 10 Brands

Last Updated on November 4, 2026

Thérapie Clinic scores highest of the ten UK aesthetic clinic brands compared, at 7.1 out of 10 on the Whito leaderboard.

Opinion and analysis. Whito read every brand below by hand, using publicly visible activity only: the first five on 12 October 2026 and the five added to make this a top ten on 22 October 2026, against the same fixed anchors and the same ten searches. Each channel is scored 0 to 10, set out under How we scored, so a score describes what we could see on the day, not the quality or safety of any treatment. Brands cannot pay to appear or to change a score. Where a figure is not published, we say so.

Many clinic owners believe aesthetics is won on Instagram. On this board, social media barely separates the brands: seven of the ten score 6 for social. The gaps that decide the ranking are reviews, email capture and whether a visitor can see a price or a practitioner’s name.

Thérapie Clinic scores 7.1, ahead of Pulse Light Clinic on 6.4 and Laser Clinics UK on 5.4. Search is weak for everyone: across our 10 UK searches, only one brand page appeared, an sk:n clinic page for ‘skin clinic Manchester’. Directories and booking platforms took the rest.

Destination Skin scores lowest at 2.3. It replied to 19 of its latest 20 Trustpilot reviews, but its homepage shows no treatment prices, no practitioner names and no social links, and we found no Google or Meta ads for it in the period checked.

The leaderboard

Average is the simple mean of the seven channel scores, rounded to one decimal place. Brands on the same average share a rank and are listed A to Z. Thérapie Clinic, Pulse Light Clinic, Laser Clinics UK, Cosmedics and Destination Skin read 12 October 2026; The Private Clinic, sk:n, The Cosmetic Skin Clinic, Ouronyx and Clinetix read 22 October 2026. Meta Ad Library counts for brands added on 22 October were read on 23 October 2026, after the library was unavailable on 22 October. The five brands read on 12 October keep the Paid scores they were given then, which include Meta.

Company verdicts

Thérapie Clinic, 7.1

Thérapie Clinic scores 7.1, the highest of the ten, and leads on reach. Its UK locations page lists 61 clinics, 27 of them in London, and it sells treatments online with £ prices such as ‘From £139.95’ for full body laser (website 9). An insider signup for deals, buy-online accounts and a Refer a Friend scheme give it the top email score here (8). Reviews score 9: 4.5 on Trustpilot from 19,405, with replies to 16 of the latest 20. It ran about 700 Google ads in 30 days. In 2024 the ASA upheld complaints about two of its ads, one on ‘up to 70% off’ savings claims and one it ruled indirectly promoted a prescription-only medicine. The clearest gap is search: none of our 10 UK searches returned its site (SEO 2).

Pulse Light Clinic, 6.4

Pulse Light Clinic scores 6.4 with the most even spread on the board. It links to seven social platforms, from Facebook to Threads and Pinterest (social 6), runs about 200 Google ads and 30 active Meta ads (paid 10), and replied to 19 of its latest 20 Trustpilot reviews, holding 4.5 from 364 (reviews 7). Its site books free consultations in clinic, by phone or by video, links price pages by category and names doctors including Dr Gordon McCauley and Dr Sein Son (website 7, brand 6). An offers signup, refer-a-friend and finance options give it email 6. The clearest gap is consistency on its own homepage, which lists five open clinics while the body text still says ‘all 4 locations in Central London’.

Laser Clinics UK, 5.4

Laser Clinics UK scores 5.4 and has the most transparent website of the ten (website 10). Its homepage shows fixed prices, such as LED light therapy at £29.50 and face microneedling at £109.99, and names its medical experts with professional registration numbers. It links to five social platforms and earns an extra SEO point for its Education Hub of treatment articles. Two channels hold it back. We found no email signup, loyalty scheme or finance offer on the homepage (email 0), and its Trustpilot profile, 4.1 from 4,721 reviews, showed no replies to the latest 20 (reviews 5). Paid was lighter than its largest rival, at 88 Google ads in 30 days. The clearest gap is email capture.

The Cosmetic Skin Clinic, 5.3

The Cosmetic Skin Clinic scores 5.3, level fourth with The Private Clinic. Reviews score 7 from 4.6 on 798 Trustpilot reviews, with replies to 16 of the latest 20. Social scores 6 for four platforms. Paid scores 10 on about 200 Google ads and 23 active Meta ads. Its website scores 6, with consultation booking but no prices. Email scores 2, and cosmeticskinclinic.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

The Private Clinic, 5.3

The Private Clinic scores 5.3, level fourth with The Cosmetic Skin Clinic. Reviews score 8 from 4.6 on 2,000 Trustpilot reviews, with replies to 16 of the latest 20. Its website scores 7, with consultation booking and CQC and GMC registration referred to, but no prices on the homepage. Social scores 6 for four platforms, and paid 8 for 84 Google ads and 8 active Meta ads. Email scores 2. theprivateclinic.co.uk appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

sk:n, 4.9

sk:n scores 4.9, sixth on the board. Reviews score 7 from 4.7 on 9,928 Trustpilot reviews, held back by no replies on the latest 20. Its website scores 7 for online booking with CQC regulation stated, but no prices on the homepage. Its Manchester clinic page appeared for ‘skin clinic Manchester’, so SEO scores 4, the only search appearance by any brand on this board. Paid scores 6 on 94 Google ads, with no active Meta ads found from an sk:n page. Court House Clinics’ old domain now redirects to an sk:n page.

Cosmedics, 4.4

Cosmedics scores 4.4. Founded in 2003 by Dr Ross Perry and describing itself as ‘Doctor-Owned, Independent’, it has clinics in Harley Street, Putney, London City and Bristol. Its website lets patients book a chosen doctor up to three months ahead and names 13 clinicians, the most on the board (website 7). It replied to 18 of its latest 20 Trustpilot reviews, though it has only 31 (reviews 5). It runs about 300 Google ads and 26 active Meta ads (paid 10). The owned channels are thin: only Facebook is linked (social 2) and we found no email signup (email 0). The clearest gap is that its ad spend is not building an audience it can contact again.

Ouronyx, 4.3

Ouronyx scores 4.3. Social scores 6 for four platforms, and email 4 for a newsletter and account login. Its website scores 6, with a consultation route but no prices. Paid scores 8 on 8 Google ads and 18 active Meta ads. Its Trustpilot profile has no reviews, so reviews score 0, and ouronyx.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

Clinetix, 4.1

Clinetix scores 4.1. The Glasgow clinic links five social platforms (social 6) and has a consultation route and a refer-a-friend voucher, but no prices on the homepage (website 6). Its Trustpilot profile shows 4.3 from just 9 reviews, so reviews score 3. No Google ads were found, but it had 11 active Meta ads (paid 6). Email scores 2, and clinetix.co.uk appeared in none of 10 UK searches, including ‘laser hair removal Glasgow’.

Destination Skin, 2.3

Destination Skin scores 2.3, the lowest of the ten. It does one thing well: it replied to 19 of its latest 20 Trustpilot reviews, holding 3.6 from 452 (reviews 5). Elsewhere the homepage gives a visitor little to go on. It offers a free consultation form and a Mix & Match calculator promising ‘up to 40% off’, but no treatment prices or practitioner names (website 5). We found no social links, no email signup, no Google ads in the last 30 days and no active Meta ads. It describes itself as ‘skincare specialists and laser hair removal experts’ with a ‘doctor led’ team. The clearest gap is naming the doctors it says lead the work.

What the channels show

Reviews reward the clinics that answer

Six of the ten brands replied to at least 16 of their latest 20 Trustpilot reviews: Destination Skin and Pulse Light Clinic 19, Cosmedics 18, and Thérapie Clinic, The Private Clinic and The Cosmetic Skin Clinic 16 each. Laser Clinics UK and sk:n replied to none, despite 4,721 and 9,928 reviews. Ouronyx has no Trustpilot reviews at all.

Prices split the board

Laser Clinics UK and Thérapie Clinic show £ prices and let visitors buy online, scoring 10 and 9 for website. The other eight push consultations without a price on the homepage, scoring 5 to 7.

Search is weak, so ads carry the load

Only one brand page appeared in any of our 10 UK searches, sk:n for ‘skin clinic Manchester’. The rest went to whatclinic.com, Fresha, Treatwell and Top Doctors. Thérapie Clinic still runs about 700 Google ads in 30 days and The Cosmetic Skin Clinic about 200.

Regulation shapes the advertising

The ASA upheld complaints about two Thérapie Clinic ads in 2024: one on ‘up to 70% off’ and ‘was’ prices (21 August 2024) and one that indirectly promoted botulinum toxin, a prescription-only medicine (18 December 2024). Advertising a consultation rather than an injectable is the safer route.

Key lessons for any aesthetic, skin or laser clinic

Name your practitioners

Laser Clinics UK lists its medical experts with professional registration numbers, and Cosmedics names 13 clinicians. A single clinic can match the chains here by showing who treats patients and how they are registered.

Keep discount claims checkable

In August 2024 the ASA ruled that Thérapie Clinic’s ‘up to 70% off’ laser ad and its ‘was’ prices were misleading. If you advertise a saving, keep records showing the ‘was’ price is your usual selling price.

Advertise the consultation, not the injectable

In December 2024 the ASA ruled that a ‘from £179’ cosmetic injections ad indirectly promoted a prescription-only medicine. Promote a consultation with a named, qualified practitioner instead, and check the CAP Code before running any injectables ad.

Reply to every review

Six of the ten reply to at least 16 of their latest 20. Laser Clinics UK and sk:n, with thousands of reviews each, reply to none of their latest 20. A small clinic can answer every review within a day or two.

Collect an email at every consultation

Three of the ten had no email signup on the homepage. Thérapie Clinic scores 8 for email with an insider list and a referral scheme. Ask for consent to send aftercare tips and offers at booking.

Steal this playbook

Five moves from this leaderboard, ranked by return on effort.

1. Reply to every review. Six of the ten brands answer at least 16 of their latest 20; the two large brands that answer none score 5 and 7 despite thousands of reviews.
2. Name your practitioners and their registrations. Laser Clinics UK and Cosmedics show names, and both earn the named-expertise brand point.
3. Add an email signup with a clear benefit. Three of the ten brands score 0 for email, while Thérapie Clinic’s insider list and referral scheme score 8.
4. Publish starting prices for non-prescription treatments. The two brands that show £ prices score 9 and 10 for website.
5. Write a page for your town. Only one brand page appeared in our ten searches, so local pages face directories rather than rival clinics.

The evidence behind the scores

One line per channel, as read on the date shown for each brand. Review figures change daily; these are the numbers on the day we looked.

Thérapie Clinic

Read 12 October 2026.

• Social 6: UK pages link to Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and LinkedIn.
• Website 9: Treatments bought online with £ prices (‘From £139.95’, ‘was £149.95’ for full body laser) and free consultation booking; no practitioner registration numbers shown.
• Email 8: ‘Become an insider’ signup for specials and deals, buy-online accounts, a Refer a Friend scheme and Klarna or Clearpay.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned therapieclinic.com in the top ten.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain therapieclinic.com: about 700 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK: 18 active ads naming the brand.
• Reviews 9: Trustpilot 4.5 from 19,405 reviews; 16 of the latest 20 have a company reply.
• Brand 6: Same name everywhere, a clear positioning line (‘Europe’s top laser hair removal clinic’) and three or more news mentions in 90 days; no long-running asset or named doctors found.

Pulse Light Clinic

Read 12 October 2026.

• Social 6: Links to Facebook, X, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Threads and Pinterest from pulselightclinic.co.uk.
• Website 7: Free consultation booking in clinic, by phone or by video, price pages per category, named doctors and a CQC statement for one clinic; no prices on the homepage.
• Email 6: Offers-and-news signup, newsletter page, refer-a-friend, gift cards and packages, with finance from 0% to 14.9% APR.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned pulselightclinic.co.uk in the top ten, plus 1 for an advice or guides library.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain pulselightclinic.co.uk: about 200 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK: 30 active ads naming the brand.
• Reviews 7: Trustpilot 4.5 from 364 reviews; 19 of the latest 20 have a company reply.
• Brand 6: Same name everywhere, a clear positioning line (‘Specialist Aesthetic Clinic for Advanced Hair, Skin & Body Treatments’) and named doctors; no long-running asset or three recent news mentions found.

Laser Clinics UK

Read 12 October 2026.

• Social 6: Links to Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn and YouTube from laserclinics.co.uk.
• Website 10: Prices on the homepage (LED £29.50, face microneedling £109.99, Hydrojelly facial £109.00), named medical experts with registration numbers, Book Now and Buy Now.
• Email 0: No email signup, loyalty scheme, membership or finance offer found on the homepage.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned laserclinics.co.uk in the top ten, plus 1 for an advice or guides library.
• Paid 8: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain laserclinics.co.uk: 88 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK: 4 active ads naming the brand.
• Reviews 5: Trustpilot 4.1 from 4,721 reviews; 0 of the latest 20 have a company reply.
• Brand 6: Same name everywhere, a clear positioning line (‘Feel ready for life with our medically-backed treatments’) and named medical experts; no long-running asset or three recent news mentions found.

The Cosmetic Skin Clinic

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to Instagram, Facebook, X and YouTube, four platforms in all.
• Website 6: Treatment pages, consultation booking and a refer-a-friend scheme; no prices or registration numbers on the homepage.
• Email 2: An email sign-up field; no account or app seen.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned cosmeticskinclinic.com in the top ten.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain cosmeticskinclinic.com: about 200 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from The Cosmetic Skin Clinic page, read 23 October 2026: 23.
• Reviews 7: Trustpilot 4.6 from 798 reviews, with a company reply on 16 of the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Non-Surgical Cosmetic Treatments Delivered by Trusted Aesthetic Specialists’); named practitioners not confirmed; three recent news mentions not checked.

The Private Clinic

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube and Facebook, four platforms in all.
• Website 7: Consultation booking, CQC and GMC registration referred to, a refer-a-friend scheme and finance; no prices on the homepage.
• Email 2: An email sign-up; no customer account or app seen.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned theprivateclinic.co.uk in the top ten.
• Paid 8: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain theprivateclinic.co.uk: 84 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from The Private Clinic of Harley Street page, read 23 October 2026: 8.
• Reviews 8: Trustpilot 4.6 from 2,000 reviews, with a company reply on 16 of the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Trusted for over 40 years’); no named practitioners confirmed on the homepage; three recent news mentions not checked.

sk:n

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 4: Links to Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, three platforms in all.
• Website 7: Online booking for consultations and treatments, a refer-a-friend scheme, finance and CQC regulation stated; no prices on the homepage. courthouseclinics.com now redirects to an sk:n page.
• Email 2: An email subscribe form; no customer account or app seen.
• SEO 4: 1 of 10 UK web searches returned sknclinics.co.uk in the top ten (‘skin clinic Manchester’).
• Paid 6: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain sknclinics.co.uk: 94 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, read 23 October 2026: no active ads from an sk:n page found.
• Reviews 7: Trustpilot 4.7 from 9,928 reviews, with no company reply on the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Discover better skin.’); no long-running asset or named people confirmed; three recent news mentions not checked.

Cosmedics

Read 12 October 2026.

• Social 2: Only Facebook is linked from cosmedics.co.uk; an X handle appears in page metadata but is not linked.
• Website 7: Online booking by treatment, clinic and doctor up to three months ahead, a separate prices page, 13 named clinicians and a CQC statement; no prices on the homepage.
• Email 0: No email signup, loyalty scheme, membership or finance offer found.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned cosmedics.co.uk in the top ten, plus 1 for an advice or guides library.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain cosmedics.co.uk: about 300 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK: 26 active ads naming the brand.
• Reviews 5: Trustpilot 4.2 from 31 reviews; 18 of the latest 20 have a company reply.
• Brand 4: A clear positioning line (‘Doctor-Owned, Independent’) and 13 named clinicians including founder Dr Ross Perry; one social platform, no long-running asset or three recent news mentions found.

Ouronyx

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn and Facebook, four platforms in all.
• Website 6: Treatment information and a ‘Book now’ consultation route; no prices or registration numbers on the homepage.
• Email 4: A newsletter sign-up plus a ‘My account’ login; no app seen.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned ouronyx.com in the top ten.
• Paid 8: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain ouronyx.com: 8 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Ouronyx page, read 23 October 2026: 18.
• Reviews 0: Trustpilot profile at ouronyx.com shows no reviews, so the formula gives 0.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Ethical | Sustainable | Personal’); no named practitioners confirmed; three recent news mentions not checked.

Clinetix

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to Facebook, X, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube, five platforms in all.
• Website 6: Treatment pages and a ‘Book now’ consultation route, with a £25 refer-a-friend voucher; no treatment prices or registration numbers on the homepage.
• Email 2: An email sign-up; no account or app seen.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned clinetix.co.uk in the top ten.
• Paid 6: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain clinetix.co.uk: no ads found. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Clinetix UK page, read 23 October 2026: 11.
• Reviews 3: Trustpilot 4.3 from 9 reviews, with a company reply on 2 of the latest 20 (the profile shows fewer than 20 reviews).
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Scotland’s multi-award winning medical aesthetic clinic’); named practitioners not confirmed; three recent news mentions not checked.

Destination Skin

Read 12 October 2026.

• Social 0: No social links found on the destinationskin.com homepage, so visitors have no route to follow the brand.
• Website 5: Free consultation form with a clinician callback and a Mix & Match ‘up to 40% off’ calculator; no treatment prices or registration numbers shown.
• Email 0: Finance options only; no email signup, loyalty scheme or membership found.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned destinationskin.com in the top ten.
• Paid 2: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain destinationskin.com: no ads found. Meta Ad Library, UK: no active ads naming the brand.
• Reviews 5: Trustpilot 3.6 from 452 reviews; 19 of the latest 20 have a company reply.
• Brand 2: A clear positioning line (‘skincare specialists and laser hair removal experts’); no social profiles to match, long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions found.

How we scored

Who is on the board. Ten UK aesthetic brands (injectables, skin and laser) a consumer is likely to meet: the largest high-street chain (Thérapie Clinic, 61 UK clinics listed), a shopping-centre chain (Laser Clinics UK), a regional multi-site skin and laser chain (Destination Skin, Swindon-based), a London-led specialist clinic with a Manchester site (Pulse Light Clinic), a doctor-owned medical skin clinic group (Cosmedics), a national dermatology, aesthetic and laser chain (sk:n, which now also runs the former Court House Clinics), a Harley Street cosmetic surgery and non-surgical group (The Private Clinic), a multi-site non-surgical clinic group (The Cosmetic Skin Clinic), a London facial aesthetics clinic (Ouronyx) and a Glasgow medical aesthetics clinic (Clinetix). Chosen for relevance and size, not marketing strength.

When we looked. The board launched with five brands, read on 12 October 2026. Five more were added on 22 October 2026 to make a top ten, read against the same anchors below, with the same ten searches run again on that date. The first five were not re-read, so their figures are as of 12 October. Meta Ad Library counts for brands added on 22 October were read on 23 October 2026, after the library was unavailable on 22 October. The first five keep the Paid scores they were given on 12 October, which include Meta.

• Social: which platforms the brand links to from its own site, and whether we could see recent posting and video.
• Website: 2 for a brochure page, 4 with a contact route on mobile, 6 with a page per service and a one-step enquiry, 8 with prices or ranges and registration numbers shown, 10 with online booking or an instant priced quote.
• Email: visible capture only, as we did not subscribe test inboxes for this edition. 2 for a bare newsletter form, up to 10 for a loyalty or app ecosystem with personal offers.
• SEO: ten UK searches for this trade, run through a standard web search API (12 October 2026 for the first five brands, 22 October 2026 for the five added) (not personalised, no location set beyond the town in the query); we counted how many returned the brand’s own site in the top ten results. 0 of 10 scores 2, 1 to 2 scores 4, 3 to 4 scores 6, 5 to 6 scores 8, 7 or more scores 10, plus 1 for a substantial advice library. The searches: laser hair removal near me; anti-wrinkle injections UK; lip filler clinic UK; skin clinic UK; aesthetic clinic UK; laser hair removal London; skin clinic Manchester; aesthetic clinic Birmingham; laser hair removal Glasgow; lip filler Bristol.
• Paid: the Google Ads Transparency Centre (UK, last 30 days, by domain) and the Meta Ad Library (UK, active ads whose text names the brand, counted by the advertiser page). 2 for nothing found in either, 4 for active in one with fewer than 10 ads, 6 for active in both or 10+ in one, 8 for active in both with 10+ in at least one, 10 for 50+ Google ads and 10+ Meta ads. Paid describes visible activity, not quality. A low paid score is not a fault.
• Reviews: a fixed formula. Rating (4.7+ scores 4, 4.5 to 4.69 scores 3, 4.0 to 4.49 scores 2, 3.5 to 3.99 scores 1) plus volume (10,000+ scores 4, 1,000+ scores 3, 100+ scores 2, 20+ scores 1) plus replies to the latest 20 reviews (half or more scores 2, some scores 1).
• Brand: five checks worth 2 each: the same name and logo everywhere, one clear positioning line, a distinctive asset used for years, three or more independent press mentions in 90 days, and named people or expertise on the site.

These anchors are fixed for this edition, so the ten scores can be read against each other. Boards published before October 2026 used scores relative to the other brands on the board, so compare across boards with care.

Common questions

Which aesthetic clinic brand scores highest on the Whito leaderboard?

Thérapie Clinic scores highest of the ten UK aesthetic clinic brands compared, at 7.1 out of 10. It sells treatments online with £ prices, has the strongest email capture on the board and holds 4.5 on Trustpilot from 19,405 reviews. The score measures public marketing evidence, not the quality or safety of any treatment.

Which aesthetic clinic brand scores lowest?

Destination Skin scores lowest at 2.3 out of 10. It replies to almost every Trustpilot review, but its homepage shows no treatment prices, no practitioner names and no social links, it has no email signup, and we found no Google or Meta ads for it in the period checked.

How do aesthetic clinics perform on reviews?

Better than most trades. Six of the ten brands replied to at least 16 of their latest 20 Trustpilot reviews. sk:n has the most reviews among the brands added, 9,928 at 4.7, but replied to none of its latest 20. Ouronyx has no Trustpilot reviews.

What can a small aesthetic clinic copy from these brands?

Name your practitioners and their registrations, as Laser Clinics UK and Cosmedics do. Reply to every review, as Destination Skin and Pulse Light Clinic do. Add an email signup with a clear benefit. And publish starting prices for treatments you are allowed to advertise.

Can aesthetic clinics advertise anti-wrinkle injection prices?

Be careful. In December 2024 the ASA ruled that a Thérapie Clinic Facebook ad offering cosmetic injections ‘from £179’ indirectly promoted botulinum toxin, a prescription-only medicine, to the public, breaching CAP Code rule 12.12. Advertising a consultation with a qualified practitioner is the safer route. Check the CAP Code before running any injectables ad.

Corrections and right of reply

If your business is scored here and you think we have a fact wrong, email hello@whito.co.uk. We check it against the source, correct it within five working days if we are wrong, and publish your statement alongside if you want us to. Scores are never changed for payment or because a business has claimed a Whito listing. Full route: corrections, right of reply and removals.

Related: all UK marketing leaderboards · Aesthetic Clinics on Whito

Whito

Whito is an independent UK research publisher. We publish research on how UK businesses are found, trusted and priced: what they cost to market, how their sectors work, and who actually gets recommended. Studies are free to read, every figure carries the date it was checked, and nobody pays to appear.

See Full Bio