UK Opticians Marketing Leaderboard 2026: Feel Good Contacts, Specsavers and Glasses Direct Lead 10 Brands

Last Updated on October 23, 2026

Feel Good Contacts scores highest of the ten UK optician and eyewear brands compared, at 7.1 out of 10 on the Whito leaderboard.

Opinion and analysis. Whito read every brand below by hand on 22 October 2026, using publicly visible activity only, against fixed anchors and ten UK searches. Each channel is scored 0 to 10, set out under How we scored, so a score describes what we could see on the day, not the quality of the eye care. Brands cannot pay to appear or to change a score. Where a figure is not published, we say so.

Many opticians assume the chains win on size. On this board an online contact lens retailer outscores every high street name, because it captures email, answers search questions and holds 4.7 from 70,405 reviews.

Feel Good Contacts scores 7.1, ahead of Specsavers on 6.9 and Glasses Direct on 6.6. Specsavers is the strongest in search, appearing in 3 of 10 UK searches, including ‘opticians Manchester’ and ‘opticians Birmingham’.

Cubitts scores lowest at 3.7. Its homepage links only Instagram, its Trustpilot profile has no reviews and cubitts.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches. Reviews are otherwise this sector’s strength: seven of the ten score 8 or 9 on the review formula.

The leaderboard

Average is the simple mean of the seven channel scores, rounded to one decimal place. Brands on the same average share a rank and are listed A to Z. All ten brands read 22 October 2026; Meta Ad Library counts read 23 October 2026, after the library was unavailable on 22 October.

Company verdicts

Feel Good Contacts, 7.1

Feel Good Contacts scores 7.1, the highest of the ten. Email scores 8, the best on the board, for its app and a rewards scheme. Reviews score 9 from 4.7 on 70,405 Trustpilot reviews, with replies to 6 of the latest 20. SEO scores 5: feelgoodcontacts.com appeared for ‘eye test cost UK’ through a blog post and for ‘contact lenses delivery UK’, and the blog adds a point. Its website scores 10 for an online shop with prices on the page, and social 6 for six platforms. Paid scores 8 with about 1,000 Google ads in 30 days and 7 Meta ads.

Specsavers, 6.9

Specsavers scores 6.9, with paid at 10 for about 700 Google ads and 92 Meta ads. SEO scores 7, the highest here: specsavers.co.uk appeared in 3 of 10 UK searches, including its own town pages for Manchester and Birmingham, and its eye test guides add a point. Its website scores 10 for online booking, a £10 eye test offer and online glasses sales. Reviews score 7 from 4.5 on 192,293 Trustpilot reviews, held back by no replies on the latest 20. Brand scores 4 for one name and the ‘Should’ve gone to Specsavers’ line, in use since 2002, though the line was not on its homepage on the day. Email scores 4 for a customer login only.

Glasses Direct, 6.6

Glasses Direct scores 6.6. Reviews score 9 from 4.7 on 285,313 Trustpilot reviews, the second largest volume here, with replies to 2 of the latest 20. Its website scores 10 for an online shop with two pairs from £15 and a free home try-on. Brand scores 4 for one name and a clear line, ‘Ordering glasses online made easy’. Paid scores 10 with about 200 Google ads and 12 Meta ads. glassesdirect.co.uk appeared in none of 10 UK searches, despite lens buying guides that earn an SEO point. Email scores 4 for an account sign-in.

Boots Opticians, 6.1

Boots Opticians scores 6.1, level fourth with Vision Express. Its website scores 10 for online booking and frame prices on the homepage. Reviews score 8 from 4.2 on 235,000 reviews, but these sit on the parent Boots Trustpilot profile, which Trustpilot uses for the Boots Opticians address; it replied to 15 of the latest 20. Paid scores 10 with about 700 Google ads and 57 Meta ads. Email scores 4 for a Contact Lens Rewards Plan. bootsopticians.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

Vision Express, 6.1

Vision Express scores 6.1, level fourth with Boots Opticians. Reviews score 8 from 4.6 on 356,400 Trustpilot reviews, the most on the board, with replies to 3 of the latest 20. Paid scores 10 with about 2,000 Google ads in 30 days, the most here, and 94 Meta ads, also the most. Its website scores 10 for online eye test booking and priced frames. SEO scores 5: visionexpress.com appeared for ‘book eye test online UK’, and buyers guides add a point. Brand scores 2: the name is consistent, but no positioning line was found on the homepage.

Optical Express, 5.9

Optical Express scores 5.9, sixth on the board. Reviews score 9 from 4.6 on 20,016 Trustpilot reviews, with replies to 16 of the latest 20, the best reply habit on the board. Its website scores 10, pricing laser eye surgery from £549 per eye and booking free consultations online. Paid scores 10 with about 400 Google ads and 47 Meta ads. Two channels hold it back: email scores 0, with consultation forms but no sign-up, and SEO 2, as opticalexpress.co.uk appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

Scrivens, 5.7

Scrivens scores 5.7. Reviews score 9 from 4.7 on 2,488 Trustpilot reviews, with replies to 10 of the latest 20. SEO scores 5: scrivens.com appeared for ‘book eye test online UK’ through its FAQ, and a blog adds a point. Its website scores 6, the lowest here: ‘Book appointment’ leads to a branch finder, with no prices shown and online booking not confirmed from the homepage. Paid scores 10 with 72 Google ads and 13 Meta ads. Brand scores 2 for a consistent name only.

Leightons, 5.4

Leightons scores 5.4, with paid at 6 for about 200 Google ads and no Meta ads found. Reviews score 9 from 4.9 on 2,976 Trustpilot reviews, the joint highest rating here, with replies to 12 of the latest 20. Its website scores 10 for online eye test booking and prices on the site, including an eye care plan from £14 a month. Social scores 6 for four platforms. Email scores 2 for a subscribe offer of £10 off a first purchase. leightons.co.uk appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

Bayfields, 5.1

Bayfields scores 5.1. Reviews score 7 from 4.9 on 4,856 Trustpilot reviews, the joint highest rating here, held back by no replies on the latest 20. Its website scores 10 for online booking and prices on the homepage, including a care plan at £12 a month. Brand scores 4 for one name and a clear line, ‘Eye & Hearing Care You Can Rely On’. Email scores 0, with no sign-up seen. Paid scores 8 with 95 Google ads and 8 Meta ads. bayfieldsopticians.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches; the only Bayfields result was a local news story.

Cubitts, 3.7

Cubitts scores 3.7, the lowest of the ten. Its website scores 10, with frames at £175 and an online checkout, and brand 4 for a clear line, ‘The Modern Spectacle Maker’. Social scores 2 for Instagram only. Reviews score 0 because its Trustpilot profile has no reviews. Email scores 2 for a newsletter sign-up. Paid scores 6 with about 200 Google ads and no Meta ads found, and cubitts.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

What the channels show

Reviews are this sector’s strength

Seven of the ten score 8 or 9 on reviews. Leightons and Bayfields both hold 4.9, and Vision Express has 356,400 Trustpilot reviews at 4.6. The difference is the reply habit: Optical Express answers 16 of its latest 20, Leightons 12 and Scrivens 10, while Specsavers and Bayfields answer none of theirs.

Search goes to whoever answers the question

Specsavers appeared in 3 of 10 UK searches with its own town pages and a delivery help page. Feel Good Contacts appeared twice, once with a blog post on what skipping an eye test costs. Six of the ten appeared in none. Directories and the professional bodies held most local results.

Online booking is standard

Nine of the ten book appointments or sell online, and score 10 for website. Scrivens is the exception, sending ‘Book appointment’ to a branch finder. Prices are common too: nine of the ten show a price on the homepage or the first page clicked.

Email capture is thin

Only Feel Good Contacts pairs an app with a rewards scheme. Optical Express and Bayfields show no sign-up at all, and four others offer only a login or a rewards plan. For a service people need every two years, a recall list is the cheapest repeat booking there is.

Key lessons for any local optician

Reply to every review

Optical Express replies to 16 of its latest 20 Trustpilot reviews. A reply in your own words, especially to a complaint, shows the next patient how you look after people.

Build your recall list

Feel Good Contacts earns the top email score for its app and rewards. A single practice can do the same job with a sign-up at the eye test and a reminder when the next one is due.

Answer the questions patients search

Feel Good Contacts ranks for ‘eye test cost UK’ with a plain blog post. A page answering what an eye test costs at your practice, and what the NHS covers, is the page most local opticians are missing.

Own your town page

Specsavers appeared for Manchester and Birmingham with a page for each town. A page for your town, with your address, opening hours and booking link, is how a single practice competes there.

Pick one line and keep it

Specsavers has used the same line since 2002. You do not need a famous one, you need a consistent one, on your window, your website and your Google profile.

Steal this playbook

Five moves from this leaderboard, ranked by return on effort.

1. Reply to your latest 20 reviews. Optical Express answers 16 of its latest 20; Specsavers and Bayfields answer none.
2. Collect an email at every eye test. Feel Good Contacts scores 8 on email; Optical Express and Bayfields score 0.
3. Publish a page on what an eye test costs. Feel Good Contacts appeared for ‘eye test cost UK’ with exactly that.
4. Write one page per town you serve. Six of the ten brands appeared in none of 10 UK searches.
5. Put a price on your homepage. Nine of the ten show one; Scrivens shows none and scores lowest on website.

The evidence behind the scores

One line per channel, as read on the date shown for each brand. Review figures change daily; these are the numbers on the day we looked.

Feel Good Contacts

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to Facebook, X, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn and TikTok, six platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online shop and checkout with prices on the page (for example £11.19 and £16.45), free delivery over £89.
• Email 8: The Feel Good Contacts app plus a rewards scheme.
• SEO 5: 2 of 10 UK web searches returned feelgoodcontacts.com in the top ten (‘eye test cost UK’ and ‘contact lenses delivery UK’), plus credit for a blog.
• Paid 8: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain feelgoodcontacts.com: about 1,000 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Feel Good Contacts page, read 23 October 2026: 7.
• Reviews 9: Trustpilot 4.7 from 70,405 reviews, with a company reply on 6 of the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘A one-stop online store for all your eyewear needs’); no long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Specsavers

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to YouTube, X, Facebook and Instagram, four platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online appointment booking by store, a £10 eye test offer on the homepage, and glasses and contact lenses sold online.
• Email 4: A customer login; no newsletter form or app seen on the homepage.
• SEO 7: 3 of 10 UK web searches returned specsavers.co.uk in the top ten (‘opticians Manchester’, ‘opticians Birmingham’ and ‘contact lenses delivery UK’), plus credit for eye test and eye health guides.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain specsavers.co.uk: about 700 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Specsavers pages, read 23 October 2026: 92 (Specsavers 88, Life at Specsavers 4).
• Reviews 7: Trustpilot 4.5 from 192,293 reviews, with no company reply on the latest 20 (Trustpilot shows replies to 99% of negative reviews).
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a distinctive asset used for years, the ‘Should’ve gone to Specsavers’ line in use since 2002; the line was not on the homepage on the day, and no named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Glasses Direct

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and X, four platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online shop and checkout, with two pairs from £15 and a free home try-on.
• Email 4: A customer account sign-in and a refer-a-friend offer; no newsletter or app seen.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned glassesdirect.co.uk in the top ten, plus credit for lens buying guides.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain glassesdirect.co.uk: about 200 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Glasses Direct page, read 23 October 2026: 12.
• Reviews 9: Trustpilot 4.7 from 285,313 reviews, with a company reply on 2 of the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Ordering glasses online made easy’); no long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Boots Opticians

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 4: Links to Instagram, Facebook and TikTok, three platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online eye test booking and prices on the homepage (frames at £439.00 and £190.00, savings of up to £335).
• Email 4: A Contact Lens Rewards Plan; no newsletter form, account or app seen on the homepage.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned bootsopticians.com in the top ten, plus credit for an eye health advice library.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain bootsopticians.com: about 700 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Boots Opticians page, read 23 October 2026: 57.
• Reviews 8: Trustpilot 4.2 from 235,000 reviews on the parent Boots profile (Trustpilot sends bootsopticians.com to boots.com), with a company reply on 15 of the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘See What’s Possible’); no long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Vision Express

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 4: Links to Facebook, X and Instagram, three platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online eye test booking and an online shop with prices (glasses under £50, frames at £319).
• Email 4: An email sign-up and a customer login; no app seen.
• SEO 5: 1 of 10 UK web searches returned visionexpress.com in the top ten (‘book eye test online UK’), plus credit for glasses and lens buyers guides.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain visionexpress.com: about 2,000 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Vision Express page, read 23 October 2026: 94.
• Reviews 8: Trustpilot 4.6 from 356,400 reviews, with a company reply on 3 of the latest 20.
• Brand 2: Same name everywhere; no positioning line on the homepage, long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Optical Express

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to X, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube, five platforms in all.
• Website 10: Laser eye surgery priced from £549 per eye on the homepage, with online booking for a free consultation and eye tests.
• Email 0: Consultation forms only; no newsletter, account or app seen.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned opticalexpress.co.uk in the top ten; no advice library found.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain opticalexpress.co.uk: about 400 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Optical Express page, read 23 October 2026: 47.
• Reviews 9: Trustpilot 4.6 from 20,016 reviews, with a company reply on 16 of the latest 20.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Leading laser eye surgery’ provider); no long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Scrivens

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 4: Links to Facebook and Instagram, two platforms in all.
• Website 6: A page per service and ‘Book appointment’ buttons that lead to a branch finder; no prices shown and online booking not confirmed from the homepage.
• Email 4: A customer login; no newsletter or app seen.
• SEO 5: 1 of 10 UK web searches returned scrivens.com in the top ten (‘book eye test online UK’), plus credit for a blog and FAQ library.
• Paid 10: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain scrivens.com: 72 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Scrivens Opticians & Hearing Care page, read 23 October 2026: 13.
• Reviews 9: Trustpilot 4.7 from 2,488 reviews, with a company reply on 10 of the latest 20.
• Brand 2: Same name everywhere; no positioning line, long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Leightons

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 6: Links to Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube, four platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online eye test booking (leightons.mysight.uk) and prices on the site, including an eye care plan from £14 a month and hearing aid prices.
• Email 2: An email subscribe offer (£10 off a first purchase); no account or app seen.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned leightons.co.uk in the top ten, plus credit for an eye care blog.
• Paid 6: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain leightons.co.uk: about 200 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, read 23 October 2026: no active ads from a Leightons Opticians page.
• Reviews 9: Trustpilot 4.9 from 2,976 reviews, with a company reply on 12 of the latest 20.
• Brand 2: Same name everywhere (its social handles carry the founding year, 1928); no positioning line, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Bayfields

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 4: Links to Facebook and Instagram, two platforms in all.
• Website 10: Online booking (bayfieldsopticians.mysight.uk) and prices on the homepage, including a care plan at £12 a month and £15 off earwax removal.
• Email 0: No newsletter, account or app seen on the homepage.
• SEO 3: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned bayfieldsopticians.com in the top ten, plus credit for a blog.
• Paid 8: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain bayfieldsopticians.com: 95 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, active ads from the Bayfields Opticians page, read 23 October 2026: 8.
• Reviews 7: Trustpilot 4.9 from 4,856 reviews, with no company reply on the latest 20 (Trustpilot shows replies to 57% of negative reviews).
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘Eye & Hearing Care You Can Rely On’); no long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

Cubitts

Read 22 October 2026 (Meta read 23 October 2026).

• Social 2: Links to Instagram only.
• Website 10: Online shop and checkout with frames priced at £175.
• Email 2: A newsletter sign-up; no account or app seen.
• SEO 2: 0 of 10 UK web searches returned cubitts.com in the top ten; its journal is editorial rather than an advice library.
• Paid 6: Google Ads Transparency Centre, UK, last 30 days, by domain cubitts.com: about 200 ads. Meta Ad Library, UK, read 23 October 2026: no active ads found for Cubitts.
• Reviews 0: Trustpilot profile found with no reviews.
• Brand 4: Same name everywhere and a clear positioning line (‘The Modern Spectacle Maker’); no long-running asset, named people or three recent news mentions confirmed.

How we scored

Who is on the board. Ten UK optician and eyewear brands a patient is likely to meet when booking an eye test or buying glasses or lenses: Specsavers (the largest UK optician chain), Vision Express (national optician chain), Boots Opticians (optician chain within Boots stores and standalone practices), Optical Express (laser eye surgery and optical group), Cubitts (London spectacle maker with its own stores), Scrivens (family-owned optician and hearing chain), Leightons (optician and hearing group founded in 1928), Glasses Direct (online glasses retailer), Feel Good Contacts (online contact lens and eyewear retailer) and Bayfields (Leeds-based optician and audiology group). Chosen for relevance and size, not marketing strength.

When we looked. All ten brands were read on 22 October 2026, against the fixed anchors below, with the ten searches run on the same day. This board was first published with scores relative to the other brands on it. On 22 October 2026 it was rescored on Whito’s fixed anchors and expanded to ten brands, so scores are not comparable with the earlier edition.

• Social: which platforms the brand links to from its own site, and whether we could see recent posting and video.
• Website: 2 for a brochure page, 4 with a contact route on mobile, 6 with a page per service and a one-step enquiry, 8 with prices or ranges and registration numbers shown, 10 with online booking, an online checkout or an instant priced quote.
• Email: visible capture only, as we did not subscribe test inboxes for this edition. 2 for a bare newsletter form, 4 for a customer account, 6 for an app or a loyalty scheme, 7 for a newsletter plus an app or loyalty scheme, up to 10 for a loyalty or app ecosystem with personal offers.
• SEO: ten UK searches for this sector, run through a standard web search API on 22 October 2026 (not personalised, no location set beyond the town in the query); we counted how many returned the brand’s own site in the top ten results. 0 of 10 scores 2, 1 to 2 scores 4, 3 to 4 scores 6, 5 to 6 scores 8, 7 or more scores 10, plus 1 for a substantial advice library. The searches: opticians near me open now UK; eye test cost UK; how much are glasses UK; book eye test online UK; contact lenses delivery UK; opticians London; opticians Manchester; opticians Birmingham; opticians Leeds; opticians Bristol.
• Paid: the Google Ads Transparency Centre (UK, last 30 days, by domain) and the Meta Ad Library (UK, active ads, counted by the advertiser page). 2 for nothing found in either, 4 for active in one with fewer than 10 ads, 6 for active in both or 10+ in one, 8 for active in both with 10+ in at least one, 10 for 50+ Google ads and 10+ Meta ads. Meta Ad Library counts were read on 23 October 2026, after the library was unavailable on 22 October. Paid describes visible activity, not quality. A low paid score is not a fault.
• Reviews: a fixed formula. Rating (4.7+ scores 4, 4.5 to 4.69 scores 3, 4.0 to 4.49 scores 2, 3.5 to 3.99 scores 1) plus volume (10,000+ scores 4, 1,000+ scores 3, 100+ scores 2, 20+ scores 1) plus replies to the latest 20 reviews (half or more scores 2, some scores 1). Where Trustpilot sends a brand’s address to a parent company profile, we used that profile and say so.
• Brand: five checks worth 2 each: the same name and logo everywhere, one clear positioning line, a distinctive asset used for years, three or more independent press mentions in 90 days, and named people or expertise on the site. We award only what we could verify on the day; three recent press mentions were not confirmed for any brand.

These anchors are fixed for this edition, so the ten scores can be read against each other. Boards published before October 2026 used scores relative to the other brands on the board, so compare across boards with care.

Common questions

Which optician brand scores highest on the Whito leaderboard?

Feel Good Contacts scores highest at 7.1 out of 10, ahead of Specsavers on 6.9 and Glasses Direct on 6.6. It earns the top email score of 8 for its app and rewards scheme, holds 4.7 from 70,405 Trustpilot reviews and appeared in 2 of 10 UK searches.

Which optician brand scores lowest, and why?

Cubitts scores 3.7. Its homepage links only Instagram, its Trustpilot profile has no reviews, it offers only a newsletter sign-up, and cubitts.com appeared in none of 10 UK searches. Its website, with frames priced at £175 and an online checkout, scores 10.

How do these optician brands compare on reviews?

Ratings run from 4.2 for Boots, on its parent profile, to 4.9 for Leightons and Bayfields. Vision Express has the most reviews, 356,400, followed by Glasses Direct on 285,313. Optical Express replies to 16 of its latest 20, Boots to 15 and Leightons to 12, while Specsavers and Bayfields reply to none of their latest 20.

What can a local optician copy from these brands?

Reply to every review, as Optical Express does. Collect an email at every eye test and send a recall reminder. Publish a page on what an eye test costs at your practice. Build a page for each town you serve, since six of the ten brands appeared in none of 10 UK searches.

Why does Specsavers not lead this board?

Specsavers leads on search, appearing in 3 of 10 UK searches, and holds 4.5 from 192,293 Trustpilot reviews. It scores 4 on email, for a login only, and its reviews score is held back by no replies on the latest 20. Feel Good Contacts scores higher on email and reviews.

Corrections and right of reply

If your business is scored here and you think we have a fact wrong, email hello@whito.co.uk. We check it against the source, correct it within five working days if we are wrong, and publish your statement alongside if you want us to. Scores are never changed for payment or because a business has claimed a Whito listing. Full route: corrections, right of reply and removals.

Related: all UK marketing leaderboards · Opticians on Whito · Will AI recommend your opticians?

Whito

Whito is an independent UK research publisher. We publish research on how UK businesses are found, trusted and priced: what they cost to market, how their sectors work, and who actually gets recommended. Studies are free to read, every figure carries the date it was checked, and nobody pays to appear.

See Full Bio